"If my memory serves me correct, JFK's father was involved in corrupt stock market practices prior to the depression. That money was the foundation of the family's fortune. After the crash, federal regulations were put into place to keep him and others like him from raping our country again. JFK was by no means an innocent victim. He was neck deep in corruption. If you'll do your homework, you'd see that."
I'm aware of the History Channel.
John wasn't Joseph. Do you argue John deserved a bullet in the head for the actions of Joseph? Are you responsible for your own father's deeds? That seems to be your point, and I can't think of a better example of bias. What a snippy little "elitist" you are.